Will all the confusion surrounding Motorola's Droid X, it seems that some are still unaware of what exactly eFuses do. According to some, the minuscule circuitry can render your Droid inoperable on a whim, an unfortunate side effect of daring to modify your Android device. Others claim a Motorola CEO will personally destroy your phone should you attempt to remove MotoBlur for stock, Eclair goodness. But whatever the case may be, it's clear that people have it all wrong.
Originally conceived by IBM in the early 2000's, eFuses were intended as a simple way to alter the function and performance of a chip in real time. In other words, the company had designed a chip that could "reroute chip logic, much the way highway traffic patterns can be altered by opening and closing new lanes," according to Bernard Meyerson, vice president and chief technologist of IBM at the time. The idea was that a chip could regulate speed or power consumption issues by simply tripping a fuse, or more impressively, "repair unexpected, potentially costly flaws."
Clearly, Microsoft was employing eFuses in a very different and inventive manner than IBM had originally intended. But it raised a number of important questions with regards to how eFuses worked. Because these fuses were a hardware component of the CPU, many wondered just how many Microsoft had to play with. Would they eventually run out, allowing hackers to modify the system? But perhaps more alarmingly, a reverse engineer by the name of Speedy22 theorized that Microsoft could actually blow the CPU's eFuses in such a way that "it may be possible to shut power off to the CPU permanently or increase the core supply to the point of self-destruct."
A more likely scenario is that Motorola will follow Microsoft's update path. Most Android roots occur via exploits in older version firmwares that a user can still flash to his or her device. By blowing an eFuse each time an update is applied, Motorola could remove the ability to downgrade to a previous OS revision, and thus reducing the chance of root or custom ROMs. This seems far more likely considering recent statements from the company, explaining that eFuses ensure "that the device only runs on updated and tested versions of software." Of course, that's still not a good thing for developers and ROM hacking enthusiasts, but it's still better than a complete brick as some would like to assume.
The sad thing is, controversies like this shed a bad light on what is otherwise an impressive piece of technology. In its original incarnation, eFuses appeared to be an inventive way to reduce hardware faults, and make chips more adaptable to the ever-changing conditions within a machine. And while Microsoft and Motorola's interests may lie in maintaining security, a brick-inducing kill-switch it is most definitely not.
Images via Flickr user steeljam, Wikipedia.