How To Choose The Perfect Lens for Your First DLSR
You've been taking pictures on your point-and-shoot camera and your cell phone for years, and it's been all well and good, but you want more. You know there's a whole world of photographic choices and possibilities that pocket cameras and multipurpose devices can't match. So you pick up a digital SLR and get ready to dive into the world of serious photography.  
 
Now you have to deal with the lens question. If you're buying an entry-level digital SLR like a Canon Rebel T2i or a Nikon D5000, then you're probably getting a "kit" consisting of the camera body and an 18-55mm, f/3.5-5.6 lens. While it'll certainly let you take pictures and your results will look better than anything you've done with a point-and-shoot, that kit lens is inferior to almost any after-market lens you could pick up. If you're serious about getting into photography, you'll want to pick up at least one decent lens on top of your new SLR kit. Of course, before you make a decision, make sure you go with the right lens brand. Canon lenses work with Canon bodies and Nikon lenses work with Nikon bodies. You can't mix and match. 

  photo by Flickr user     Sweetsop
 photo by Flickr user Sweetsop
We'll teach you the technical attributes of lenses and how to pick a great one to use while you learn the ins and outs of your new camera.
 

Know Your Lenses

Before you look at lenses, it's important to understand the basic characteristics of lenses and be aware of why exactly your kit lens is an inferior product. Camera lenses have two general attributes: f-stop and focal length. The focal length is the most prominent aspect of a lens, because it dictates exactly how far you can zoom in or how wide you can pull back. The larger the number (measured in millimeters), the higher the magnification. An 18mm lens can take a very wide photo, while a 250mm lens can get very close to far-off subjects. However, that's only half of the equation. The other half is the lens's f-stop, and it's just as important. 
 
The f-stop, otherwise known as the aperture, determines your depth of field (the area in focus) and how much light can pass through the lens to reach the sensor. The rule is that the smaller the number, the wider the aperture and the more light that can hit the sensor. This is extremely important, because it determines how fast and at what light sensitivity (ISO) your camera can shoot in different lighting conditions. The difference between an f/1.8 lens and an f/5.6 lens can be the difference between a clean picture of a church at dusk shot at ISO 400 or a grainy image shot at ISO 3200. The width the aperture also determines how narrow the focal plane is; a wide aperture will let you focus sharply on your subject while leaving the background out of focus, while a narrow aperture will make everything in both foreground and background look sharp. 

  A photo taken with a wide aperture lens.
 A photo taken with a wide aperture lens.
Lenses can vary their apertures, and the f-stop number listed when shopping for a lens describes the widest possible opening; an f/1.8 lens can open up to f/1.8, but can also close down to f/2, f/4, f/8, and so on. For lenses that can vary their focal length, the f-stop range matches the range of the focal length; the 18-55mm, f/3.5-5.6 kit lens can open up to f/3.5 at 18mm and f/5.6 at 55mm. As you move onto the more expensive zoom lenses, they maintain a constant aperture. These lenses, like the 24-70mm f/2.8, are the favorites of professional photographers.
 

Start with the budget basics

Chris Gampat of The Phoblographer knows his lenses, and brings up a handful of options for replacing the mediocre kit lens that came with your SLR. There are many, many different lenses available, but Gampat recommends that first-time DSLR owners start off with a simple 50mm prime lens. Canon and Nikon offer 50mm, f/1.8 lenses for $99 and $125 respectively, and they can get you started shooting sharp, vivid images on a shoestring budget. If you can afford to spend $300 to $350, you can pick up an f/1.4 lens that's even sharper and brighter, but for the moment it's best to take baby steps and ease into the photography game.  
 

A Lens for getting personal

If you want to move a little bit closer with your pictures, we suggest an 85mm lens. In fact, according to Gampat, an 85mm lens is a vital part of anyone's camera bag. It provides the ideal amount of magnification to frame portraits, and let you get great detail at concerts, weddings, and other events without moving up so close you disrupt the proceedings. It's more expensive than a 50mm lens at the same f-stop, though; 85mm f/1.8 lenses for both Canon and Nikon SLRs can be found for $300 to $350 on this budget lens round-up

 A photo taken with an 85mm f/1.8 lens.
 A photo taken with an 85mm f/1.8 lens.

Taking the broad view

For a slightly wider view than a 50mm prime, a 35mm lens offers more flexibility when shooting landscapes and vistas. While it won't get as wide a shot as an 18-55mm kit they're much brighter lenses. Canon's 35mm f/2.0 lens is available for $330, while Nikon's 35mm f/1.8 can be picked up for just $200. Of course, the lens depends on the camera; if you have a Canon SLR, don't think you can save $130 by grabbing the Nikon. Without the right body, the lens is useless. 
 

Zoom zoom

Finally, if you want sheer telephoto flexibility at the expense of f-stop numbers, you can pick up a 50-250mm, f/4.0-5.6 lens for $300 or less. On one hand, you'd be able to get much closer than the 85mm lens, and you'd still be able to pull back to 50mm. On the other hand, at f/4.0-5.6, the lens is darker and less sharp than a similarly priced prime lens. Large, variable-zoom lenses also tend to be much heavier than prime lenses, which is another thing to consider. Gampat notes that some variable-zoom lenses can be useful, but cheaper ones (like ones available for $300 or less) offer inferior image quality and says that if you value sharp photos on a budget, you should stick with a decent prime lens or two. In contrast, a very good variable-zoom lens like Canon's 24-105mm f/4 lens costs over $1,000.  
 
The best thing you can to do get started with a decent lens is to grab a $100, 50mm f/1.8 lens. It's flexible and will offer sharp pictures that your kit lens won't come close to. Once you're comfortable with that, consider picking up a quality 35mm or 85mm lens. While more expensive, they're even more useful in certain roles and still offer excellent image quality for a good price. If you really want a powerful telephoto lens, you'll have to decide whether you'll be satisfied with an inferior picture or if you're willing to sink a lot of cash into getting a long zoom. For most photography, however, you'll have the best time between 35mm and 85mm. 
 
What was the first lens you bought for your DSLR?
 
Image credits: Flickr users Sweetsop (lead image), Velo Steve, Lord colus, Julio Aguiar, 96dpi, Robert Donovan, Filan, Steve Keys
23 Comments
Landmine online on July 13, 2010
I just bought a Nikon D90 with a Nikkor AF-S 18-105mm  f3.5-5.6 kit lens. I'm having fun with the kit lens while in the process of learning the camera, but as I learn more through experimenting with the camera I can tell that I'll need some higher quality lenses to get some of the shots I want.  Great article, lots of helpful information for an amateur photographer like myself.
stenchlord on July 13, 2010
I wouldn't count out the stock standard kit lenses. 
Before spending more money on more lenses and kit/gear I think people need to familiarize themselves with their cameras and their technique before they start throwing cash around (no matter how little the amount).
When I first got into photography I was able to take shots that I still consider good photos despite being shot with the "crappy" kit lenses.
 
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1367/1376956654_35bc5ec776_z.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1390/1376965760_2c1834873b_z.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1167/1376055643_8ca2ac9325_z.jpg
 
All taken with the kit 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 non-IS Canon lens. 
Technique can make up for many failings the kit lenses have.
simian online on July 13, 2010
Unless something has changed in the last year or two, I would suggest NOT getting the Canon 50mm f/1.8 . It's junk, it feels cheap and you're better spent going to the 50mm f/1.4.
 
When I got my first DSLR (XSi) I tossed the kit lens (EF-S 18-55 blehk) that came with it and went to a  EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS which, all things considered, wasn't a bad lens. Build was nice and the optics were good.
Right now I'm debating between the 85mm f/1.2 , 70-200mm f/2.8 II or a 24-70mm f/2.8. I could use more primes but that particular telephoto is sexy. The zoom would be a replacement for the 24-105mm that came as a part of the kit.
Binman88 on July 13, 2010
@stenchlord: I agree. The kits lens I got with my D5000 in April has been more than capable for someone like me who is just getting into photography.
spaded131 on July 13, 2010
good article,  i do photography at uni and have been working frelance,  i often find myself doing an entire peice of work on a 50mm 1.8 prime lens, i enjoy  the lack of zoom, i feel it makes you more in touch with the camera, howeer is never the camera most important bit, there are photographers who take amazing photos with terrible cameras :D 
still off point, great article,
bagels on July 13, 2010
@simian: Seconding this. The Canon f/1.8 is built incredibly cheap, and while it may look like you're getting a bargain, it will literally fall appart within a few years of use — perhaps even less. The lens is not built to last, and if you spend the extra bit of money and go for the f/1.4, you'll be far happier. 
 
@stenchlord: Definitely agree here. I remember I counted out that lens when I first started shooting, but it produced some decent results that I still use in photosets and portfolios to this day. I've moved onto an L series lens as my general shooter, but I'll still bust out the 18-55mm every now and then, just because.  
 
Great recommendations though, Will. First lens I picked up for my aging 30D was a 17-35mm f/2.8L. It's a strange lens, produced before the sharper 16-35mm, but far less expensive — and still better than Canon's mid-range 17-40mm. Using it on a crop body, it's obviously not as wide as I like, and chromatic aberration seems to be a common problem with a lot of the concert stuff I shoot, but I'm not too bothered with it over all. Been a great lens for the nearly four years I've owned it. I figure once I get a 16-35mm, I can relegate the 17-40mm to second-body duty.
simian online on July 13, 2010
@bagels said:
Great recommendations though, Will. First lens I picked up for my aging 30D was a 17-35mm f/2.8L. It's a strange lens, produced before the sharper 16-35mm, but far less expensive — and still better than Canon's mid-range 17-40mm. Using it on a crop body, it's obviously not as wide as I like, and chromatic aberration seems to be a common problem with a lot of the concert stuff I shoot, but I'm not too bothered with it over all. Been a great lens for the nearly four years I've owned it. I figure once I get a 16-35mm, I can relegate the 17-40mm to second-body duty. "
The 16-35mm is really nice. It's probably been my oft used lens since I got it this year especially being to shoot it so wide & I shoot a lot of indoor scenes (with the little help of my Gary Fong).
Peacemaker on July 13, 2010
Nice article.  I've had a rebel XSI for about a year now, using mostly the stock lens.  I'm probably going to end up getting the 50mm one, mostly for the nice aperture setting. 
gpbmike on July 13, 2010
I got the Nikon 50mm and I loves it.
eshchan on July 13, 2010
does the 85mm wide enough for a crop sensor?
Goatie on July 13, 2010
The first lens I bought for my Canon EOS 400D(Rebel XTi / KISS Digital X) was of course the Canon 50mm f/1.8 II. The next lens I have my eyes on is Sigma's 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 APO DG lens which costs around $285-290 USD. Later on I'll probably get one of Canon's more pricier macro lenses. 
 
Alot of people say the kit lens is not good enough for taking good/great pictures, but don't listen to them. Underestimating the kit lens is a bad idea. 
Here's two pictures I've taken with the kit lens and they came out pretty good:  
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4540341573_de934d7962_o.jpg  
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2696/4540975714_555faf787e_o.jpg
simian online on July 13, 2010
@eshchan said:
" does the 85mm wide enough for a crop sensor? "
Depending on the crop factor it's going to be a minimum of 104 which is into telephoto/macro territory. There also the possibility of some heavy vignetting depending on the make.
simian online on July 13, 2010
@Goatie said: 
Alot of people say the kit lens is not good enough for taking good/great pictures, but don't listen to them. Underestimating the kit lens is a bad idea. 
Here's two pictures I've taken with the kit lens and they came out pretty good:  
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4540341573_de934d7962_o.jpg  
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2696/4540975714_555faf787e_o.jpg "
Too true. Good pictures are 80% photographer, 15% hardware and 5% luck. 
And 10% nudity.
nobull6 on July 13, 2010
Agreed. Picked up the 50 mm prime lens as my very first DSLR. It's sometimes irritating when I've got limited space and can't get everything I want to in the frame, but overall I'm very pleased. It's great for taking pictures in the house because even with the low light I can use a high shutter speed as long as I'm comfortable with a wide aperture. Very happy with it, but looking for something with higher zoom next.
risingsunset7890 on July 13, 2010
@stenchlord said:
" I wouldn't count out the stock standard kit lenses. 
Before spending more money on more lenses and kit/gear I think people need to familiarize themselves with their cameras and their technique before they start throwing cash around (no matter how little the amount).
When I first got into photography I was able to take shots that I still consider good photos despite being shot with the "crappy" kit lenses.
 
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1367/1376956654_35bc5ec776_z.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1390/1376965760_2c1834873b_z.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1167/1376055643_8ca2ac9325_z.jpg  All taken with the kit 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 non-IS Canon lens.  Technique can make up for many failings the kit lenses have. "
 
Indeed, a lot of it is getting familiar with the equipment you have. Those are some nice shots you have there stenchlord.  I got a Nikon D80 with a stock   18-135mm AF-S DX and have been using that with pretty good results. Recently though I purchased my first lens, a Sigma 50mm Macro lens for the closeups that telephoto just can't get.
IdleGod on July 13, 2010
Ok, this article clears up a LOT for me.  
 
I just bought my first DSLR this weekend, and have been playing with it a bunch. Its a T2i with a 18-35mm kit. I don't necessarily want to be spending a lot of money, at least not yet.  My father has an old SLR from Olympus (OM-1), with a 135mm prime lens (as well as a 50mm prime). I don't really know more about those lenses, but I know he spent a fair amount on them.  
 
I found an adaptor for an OM -> Canon EOS for less then $100. What are your thoughts on using an adaptor for older lenses? If its a good quality lens, would one expect to get good shots, or are newer lenses far superior? The OM1 was produced in the 70's, so I expect the telephoto to be no newer then about 1985. I won't get the auto-focus, which may be a problem on the rebel without a focus view in the viewfinder...   
 
I know about the 1.6x thing, due to the smaller sensor size versus the 35mm film size on "proper" SLR cameras. That would mean the 135mm would be equal to about 216mm. But would the quality be degraded? Worst case, that gives me two primes that I can use for less then $100... (actually, $25 for a cheapo adaptor, around $100 for a "pro" version).  
 
And speaking about the 1.6x, if one were to get a Canon, non-EF-S lens, does that mean it would apply the 1.6x to it? 
mkuehn on July 13, 2010
I initially got the Nikkor 50mm 1.8 for use on my D60, but found that not having auto-focus capabilities built into that lens affected my ability to get any fast-moving subject shots, and I also couldn't just hand off the camera to anyone and expect them to be able to use the camera. This was before Nikon came out with the 35mm 1.8 mentioned in this article, which I also bought, and I love it. Low-light photos turn out great, even at lower ISO settings. For the price, it can't be beat. Most recently, I picked up a refurb Nikon 55-200mm, and I really like this lens too. Being able to reach beyond the 55mm of the 18-55mm kit lens, all the way to 200mm, is awesome. When the light is bright, especially outdoors, you'll get some great shots. I'd sure love to have some of the "fancier" lenses, but at the price points I can afford, I've got very few complaints about the lenses I've purchased, and I'd recommend them to all new Nikon DSLR users.
greatpix55 on July 13, 2010
I was in photo retail for 27 years, a professional photographer for 20 and even a reviewer for camera gear over at two other websites so I think I'm qualified to remark on some of the statements in this article.
 
First off, the inexpensive zoom lenses packaged in some of these DSLR kits are hardly "mediocre" and offer a very good starting point for the vast majority of people wanting to get into the hobby. His advice to buy a 50mm lens instead might have been sound back in the 70's but not nowadays. For most people the versatility of a zoom is more valuable than a lens that has more light gathering ability.  Another fact to take into consideration is the magnification factor that most DSLR's have, which turns that 'normal' 50mm lens from the film camera days into a slight telephoto lens. While this is and advantage if the person wants to shoot portraiture its not so great for shooting the obligatory  family portrait in front of the fireplace or everyone sitting around the table at Christmas.
 
Most people starting out in photography don't know what they want to do, portraiture, landscape, sports, etc. This is the big advantage of starting out with a zoom lens, or two.  A zoom gives you flexibility while you're learning what you want to do with this new hobby of yours. 
 
My advice for most people is to decide if they can afford to go with the two lens kits, or perhaps buy more of an all-in-one design lens like an 18-200 zoom.  An all-in-one design has its own short comings but more than makes up for them by being ready for anything.  I'm sure most of you have missed a great shot from time to time because the perfect moment happened while you were  changing lenses. 
 
My other piece of advice is to invest in an external flash, preferably one with a bounce head. An external flash is one of the accessories to add to your kit that can make a huge improvement in your pictures. You needn't spend more than $100 for a decent flash (check out Metz's offerings).
 
Otherwise, buy a case that you can live with, one that with a little extra space for future purchases. Invest in a good quality tripod and pick up an inexpensive 3rd party wired or wireless remote. Check out what's available in photo software for your computer, often the OS comes with software for doing basic image retouching and there are lots of freeware titles available also. Pick up a good quality memory card and a card reader (optional but very useful).
 
Use the best tool for learning photography, the Internet. I wish I'd had its resources back in the late 60's when I first got interested in photography.
 
Finally, and this is probably the most important tip: Get out there and shoot!
MAGZine online on July 13, 2010
@IdleGod: I'm curious about lens-adaption, too. 
 
I can get my hands on some old (and decidedly pricey) glass, but I have my heart set on a Canon, and the lens is a Pentax. I was looking at the adapter rings, and while it looks like not all of the features may carry over (AF being one of them I think), I'm curious to know if anyone here has had any experience with adapter rings.
bereft on July 13, 2010
The kit lenses are not half-bad in certain cases. For example, the kit lens for the Mark II is the 24-105 f4 L lens :)  
 
Nevertheless, I remember the 18-55mm that came with my 450D was pretty decent in terms of sharpness and overall quality. And it came with built in stabilization, which was definitely welcome when I was starting off.  
The kit lens which came with the 7D wasn't half bad either. Unfortunately, the more expensive the glass the better the quality, and I can honestly say that the 24-70 2.8 L is the best lens I have gotten yet.  
The other thing that perhaps should have been mentioned is the crop factor aspect. Considering that most people starting off are going to get an APS-C sensor camera (1.6x), then they technically could get away with using a 50mm prime instead of going for a potentially more expensive 85mm equivalent, considering that the magnification provided will end up being (1.6 x 50) 80mm. 
  • Type the words above including the space. Get new words?
Errors will go here
Post Reply
Processing....
Popular News
How To Rip DVDs to Play on Any Device—For Free!

Our ultimate DVD copying guide shows you how to use Handbrake to rip discs for playback on your laptop, Xbox, PS3, iPhone, Zune, netbook, iPad, PSP, iPod, and pretty much anything else

Video: How To Build the Best $1500 Gaming PC, Step-by-Step

Do you like saving money? What about playing PC games? Have you ever considered building your own PC? We show you exactly what you need to know to build an awesome $1500 gaming PC.

How To Build an Awesome $500 Windows Home Server

We pick the best parts to build a lean media backup and streaming machine.

Apple iPad Wi-Fi Review

Apple's device isn't magical, but it is going to make the tablet a real category--for better or for worse

Nexus One vs HTC Desire vs HTC Incredible: What's the Difference?

HTC is releasing more Android phones all the time, but is there a difference?

How To Steal Mac OS's Best Features for Windows

Windows 7's Aero is a fine UI, but there are just a few things it's missing. Here's how to steal some of Mac OS's features.

How To Rip a Blu-Ray Movie with Just One Click

The MakeMKV utility decrypts and rips a Blu-Ray disc with just one click, preserving the original video quality of the source file.

How To Stream All of Your Video Files to iPhone and iPad

Get your DVD rips off your computer and play them on a mobile device, without having to convert them beforehand.

Apple Fall Event 2010 Discussion Thread: iPods and AppleTV

Discuss Apple's Fall Event announcements here!

What Are You Playing This Weekend?

The weekend's upon us, and like any good nerds, we're spending the last days of summer holed up in our houses playing board and video games. What are you playing this weekend?

iPod Nano 6G vs 5G: Everything You Need to Know

The iPod nano is ready to go running. Are you?

Your Shiny New Xbox 360 Controller is Already Outdated

Transforming d-pad makes it more than just a cosmetic update.

Everything You Should Know about Apple's New iPod Touch

All views expressed in this deck are the sole property of the internet rumor machine.

Why the Obama Administration's Stance on Piracy Sidesteps Complicated Issues

Addressing an audience of workers in the music industry, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke reaffirmed the Obama administration's commitment to cracking down on media piracy on the Internet.

Living with Technology: Two Mice for One Desktop PC

What would drive a man to use two mice for one computer?

Android Market Roundup: 5 Apps to Put a Smile on Your Phone

It's the weekly Android Market Roundup.

Apple Fall Event 2010 Discussion Thread: iPods and AppleTV

Discuss Apple's Fall Event announcements here!

What Are You Playing This Weekend?

The weekend's upon us, and like any good nerds, we're spending the last days of summer holed up in our houses playing board and video games. What are you playing this weekend?

Your Shiny New Xbox 360 Controller is Already Outdated

Transforming d-pad makes it more than just a cosmetic update.

Never Give Up: Microsoft May Be Working on One More Zune

Just in time for Apple's new iPod Touch announcement, a rumor is brewing indicating that Microsoft is going to give the Zune another go.

Why the Obama Administration's Stance on Piracy Sidesteps Complicated Issues

Addressing an audience of workers in the music industry, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke reaffirmed the Obama administration's commitment to cracking down on media piracy on the Internet.

The New AppleTV: $99, No Apps, All About Streaming

The original AppleTV was a device with an identity crisis. The latest update aims to fix that, and a whole lot more.

Living with Technology: Two Mice for One Desktop PC

What would drive a man to use two mice for one computer?

Everything You Should Know about Apple's New iPod Touch

All views expressed in this deck are the sole property of the internet rumor machine.